Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
41. Allows CEOs to expel members in space - Ideas for solving the previous abuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alvatore DiMarco wrote: I wonder what the so-called "original exploit" was. Amizo Hamma wrote: Abusive situations: You're at war with another corp/alliance. You have a bait ship waiting. Opponents attack. You expel the member in the ba...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.21 12:08:00
|
42. New Players left out. Drones V is unfair. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Great minds think alike.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.21 02:26:00
|
43. New Players left out. Drones V is unfair. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Invisusira wrote: 5 days of training is literally nothing. No, 5 days of training is literally 5 days of training.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.21 01:48:00
|
44. Allows CEOs to expel members in space - Ideas for solving the previous abuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Corp-side limited engagements are clunky and probably hard to program. I agree that a simple "Eject from corp on next logout or dock" flag would be far better. Or hell, even "Eject from corp on next warp " could work. Don't give me this crap ab...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.21 00:16:00
|
45. A simple but playable way to deal with Scammers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't like the scammers either (not because they're 'evil', simply because they spam what would otherwise be a heavily occupied chat channel) but I don't think there's a real solution to this. It's something we're just going to need to deal with.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.20 23:52:00
|
46. Why We Should Support Off Grid Boosting - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hello, operator? I think I've been trolled
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.20 23:47:00
|
47. Walking in Stations as a Social Hub: Business vs Pleasure in Incarna - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Siobhan MacLeary wrote: [quote=Silent Rambo]This is about the only thing I disagree with thus far. I rather like the third-person over-the-shoulder view - after all, the point of WiS from a technological standpoint is to show off the character ...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.20 23:37:00
|
48. So, a piece of tritanium - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Knights Armament wrote: My theory is that their is some deep bug within the code that respawned you with 1 trit, and instead of fixing the bug they made it a feature, either that or in order for the respawning system to work, you have to genera...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.20 14:09:00
|
49. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: gaijiin pok wrote: Azami Nevinyrall wrote: If you cloak, you should be removed from local. Just like WH space. wouldn't this be nice, a stealth ship could actually be .... stealthy Pok Tell me how many free ...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.18 01:35:00
|
50. Looking for an impartial view of the null sec war going on - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: If the goons lose this war, and lose a large percentage territory and income streams, you can bet that their CSM reps will start applying serious pressure to CCP to change the game mechanics to something that weakens th...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 22:41:00
|
51. The Bounty System - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What annoys me is how rare buyable kill rights are. But I guess assassins are implicitly criminals.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 22:16:00
|
52. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, this is a bit more like it. A discussion about local and intel gathering as opposed to AFK cloaking. Personally, I don't think Local should be an intel tool at all. Not even in high sec. Make it show only through participation, ala wormho...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 21:20:00
|
53. Posting with a Forum Alt - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
NPC corp main posting all day every day
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 03:29:00
|
54. Is Incarna worth pursuing, and what does it need to succeed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ruze wrote: Drama. Way too much of it was unnecessary. The NEX store was worth griping over, in my book. But it's since spawned a cycle of 'let's protest everything'. You have to remember that, at the time, Incarna was hyped to **** . It was...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 01:01:00
|
55. Can't open launcher under windows 8? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
See, this is why I didn't even upgrade to windows 7 for like 5 years. You may have better luck in one of the support forums.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 00:56:00
|
56. Walking in Stations as a Social Hub: Business vs Pleasure in Incarna - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I actually had a thought of, when in CQ, hiding the UI entirely . Like, it's just first person view. Holding a button brings up a radial menu or the neocom, and you've got a text chat for those who don't have eve voice (although I'd like to see v...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 00:13:00
|
57. Walking in Stations as a Social Hub: Business vs Pleasure in Incarna - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ruze wrote: clipped I like first person, I like the port cam, I like the idea of inviting people over, and the idea of using the TV in the CQ as an actual TV (native synctube or livestream support please). My main problem is that most of wha...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.17 00:00:00
|
58. Much Ado About AFK Cloaking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Somebody in this thread probably wrote: An AFK cloaker is completely harmless. So is a pilot in a pod or a shuttle, but we're still allowed to hunt and kill them.
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.16 23:23:00
|
59. NPC Faction Standing should be removed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
See if tags4sec works out without any major issues. If so, bring on tags4faction. As long as somebody does the work, that's all that really matters. But It should probably only be used to repair damaged standings, rather than to try and boost your...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.16 23:19:00
|
60. I Don't Like Ore Sites Being Cosmic Anomalies - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ace Boogi wrote: Black Dranzer wrote: Honestly, I'd like to see ore sites as both anomalies and signatures. I mean, we have cosmic anomalies for low-grade combat, but we also have the combat sites that need to be scanned down. Maybe the sa...
- by Black Dranzer - at 2013.06.16 23:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |